[Bug 207210] emulators/pipelight: fix build
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Sun Apr 3 13:20:49 UTC 2016
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207210
--- Comment #9 from commit-hook at freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: rakuco
Date: Sun Apr 3 13:20:22 UTC 2016
New revision: 412468
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/412468
Log:
Re-roll pluginloader entries in distinfo.
The port broke in the beginning of February when upstream uploaded a new
pluginloader tarball to MASTER_SITES.
Since the tarball is unversioned and only contains prebuilt Windows binaries,
here's an attempt at explaining what happened (thanks to Grzegorz Junka for
the
investigation):
- Pipelight seems to be really bad at communication. The "News" section on
the
website says 0.2.8 is the latest version.
- The "Compile Pipelight" section says 0.2.8.1 is the latest version.
- 0.2.8.2 was tagged in BitBucket in October 2015 but was never announced
anywhere on the website, and the project does not seem to have a mailing
list.
- The pluginloader tarballs, which contain prebuilt Windows binaries for
Pipelight's src/windows directory, were not updated at the time 0.2.8.2 was
tagged (the SHA256 checksums match those in the 0.2.8.1 directory in
MASTER_SITES). This only happened in February 2016, which broke our
distinfo.
Note that it is unclear why the pluginloader tarballs were not generated in
October, and since those are binary blobs it is still possible that they do
not
correspond to their respective source files. In the future, it would be good
to
build those binaries with our MinGW ports instead of relying on those blobs.
PR: 207210
Submitted by: Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj at anongoth.pl>,
Grzegorz Junka <list1 at gjunka.com>
MFH: 2016Q2
Changes:
head/emulators/pipelight/distinfo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list