[Bug 193183] [STAGE] net/beacon: Request MAINTAINERship, pkg-descr cleanup

bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Mon Sep 8 13:44:14 UTC 2014


https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193183

--- Comment #19 from C Hutchinson <portmaster at bsdforge.com> ---
(In reply to John Marino from comment #18)
> (In reply to C Hutchinson from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #14)
> > >  * I believe MANCOMPRESSED only applies when using INSTALL_MAN
> > >  * I don't believe MANCOMPRESSED needs and can used within a target
> > >  * It also defaults to no (according to Mk/bsd.port.mk)
> > > 
> > > But more important, MANCOMPRESSED doesn't do anything anymore. You can
> > > remove it.
> 
> > Far be it, for _me_ to come off as any sort of expert on all this.
> > But I spent quite some time researching, and testing against
> > MANCOMPRESSED. I found without my additional entry
> > 
> > compress-man:
> > MANCOMPRESSED=    no
> > 
> > the plist line
> > perllocal.pod
> > 
> > became orphaned, and the addition of perllocal.pod.gz, also
> > became a problem. I found that adding the compress-man:
> > resolved this, and I no longer received complaints from
> > make(1) check-plist.
> 
> 
> Kubilay is correct.  Regardless of what check-plist is says (and we already
> know that it gives misleading information and some things that successfully
> shut it up are wrong), MANCOMPRESSED should not be used.
> 
> What about just removing perllocal.pod from the pkg-plist?  why do we need
> it?

Thanks for your input John.
I'll re-visit this, and update diff, as needed/required. In just a few
minutes.

--Chris

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list