ports/150235: sysutils/smartmontools build system bug
Garrett Wollman
wollman at FreeBSD.org
Sun Sep 5 19:00:23 UTC 2010
The following reply was made to PR ports/150235; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman at FreeBSD.org>
To: Alex Samorukov <samm at os2.kiev.ua>
Cc: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org, developers at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/150235: sysutils/smartmontools build system bug
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 14:53:10 -0400
<<On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:24:59 +0200, Alex Samorukov <samm at os2.kiev.ua> said:
> Very funny. I don`t think so. Try to argue your position next time,
> this may help.
Only if someone is willing to actually engage in an argument.
> BTW - this "bug" was in smartmontools from early beginning and only
> you hit this condition - i think that is very good indicator of its
> importance, isn`t it?
A bug is a bug.
> Your commit will break smartmontools functionality, as i mentioned
> before. Thats why i`m against it. Try to read before posting.
What commit? I haven't committed anything.
> The required file was never included in the /usr/include. And it was
> changed more then once from the beginning.
If anything in userland links against a kernel header, then that
header needs to be installed in /usr/include, end of story.
-I/usr/src/sys is never acceptable in userland code.
> You can troll this way as long as you want. And of course, you VERY need
> to upgrade smartmontools in the middle of the system upgrade cycle.
Of course one needs to upgrade all ports in the middle of the upgrade
cycle, if one wishes to have a working system at the end of it --
particularly in the case of something that uses CAMIOCOMMAND, which
does not have any backwards-compatibility mechanism (hmmm, another bug
here).
-GAWollman
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list