ports/150235: sysutils/smartmontools build system bug

Garrett Wollman wollman at FreeBSD.org
Sun Sep 5 19:00:23 UTC 2010


The following reply was made to PR ports/150235; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Garrett Wollman <wollman at FreeBSD.org>
To: Alex Samorukov <samm at os2.kiev.ua>
Cc: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org, developers at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/150235: sysutils/smartmontools build system bug
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 14:53:10 -0400

 <<On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:24:59 +0200, Alex Samorukov <samm at os2.kiev.ua> said:
 
 > Very funny.  I don`t think so. Try to argue your position next time, 
 > this may help.
 
 Only if someone is willing to actually engage in an argument.
 
 > BTW - this "bug" was in smartmontools from early beginning and only
 > you hit this condition - i think that is very good indicator of its
 > importance, isn`t it?
 
 A bug is a bug.
 
 > Your commit will break smartmontools functionality, as i mentioned 
 > before. Thats why i`m against it. Try to read before posting.
 
 What commit?  I haven't committed anything.
 
 > The required file was never included in the /usr/include. And it was 
 > changed more then once from the beginning.
 
 If anything in userland links against a kernel header, then that
 header needs to be installed in /usr/include, end of story.
 -I/usr/src/sys is never acceptable in userland code.
 
 > You can troll this way as long as you want. And of course, you VERY need 
 > to upgrade smartmontools in the middle of the system upgrade cycle.
 
 Of course one needs to upgrade all ports in the middle of the upgrade
 cycle, if one wishes to have a working system at the end of it --
 particularly in the case of something that uses CAMIOCOMMAND, which
 does not have any backwards-compatibility mechanism (hmmm, another bug
 here).
 
 -GAWollman



More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list