ports/109364: lang/g95 is improperly marked as being superseded by gfortran

[Douglas Wells]

>Number:         109364
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       lang/g95 is improperly marked as being superseded by gfortran
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Feb 20 16:00:13 GMT 2007
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Douglas Wells
>Release:        FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p1 i386
>Organization:
Connection Technologies
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD flame.contek.com 6.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p1 #0: Sun Feb 11 18:14:07 EST 2007 root at flame.contek.com:/other5/src.6.2/sys/i386/compile/FLAME.6.2 i386


	Newly cvsup'd ports tree.  I have also manually removed
	/usr/ports/MOVED and re-cvsup'd to verify integrity of
	MOVED.

>Description:
	I have both gfortran-4.2 and g95 installed on my system from the
	ports tree.  Recently I have noticed that an upgrade offsets to
	replace g95 with gfortran:

		"--->  Upgrading 'g95-0.91.20070129' to 'gcc-withfortran-4.2.0_20070214' (lang/gfortran)"

	I believe this is an error and both the g95 and gfortran
	ports should be able to exist simultaneously.  I suspect
	that this is due to a line in /usr/ports/MOVED:
		"lang/g95|lang/gfortran|2004-02-11|change to appropreate name"
	Due to the 2004 date, I would guess that gfortran used to
	installed as g95 and was moved to gfortran in 2004. Once
	the g95 was added (I first noticed the current g95 port
	in late January), I suspect that the line in MOVED should
	have been nullified in some manner.

>How-To-Repeat:
	Install g95 (g95-0.91.20070129).
	Install gfortran (gcc-withfortran-4.2.0_20070124)
	Run portupgrade -rR

>Fix:

	Perhaps by deleting relevant line from /usr/ports/MOVED
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: