ports/81405: [update] sysutils/adtool to 1.3

Andrej Zverev az at inec.ru
Wed May 25 11:10:05 UTC 2005


The following reply was made to PR ports/81405; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrej Zverev <az at inec.ru>
To: bug-followup at freebsd.org, Joseph Scott <joseph at randomnetworks.com>,
        Sergey Matveychuk <sem at freebsd.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/81405: [update] sysutils/adtool to 1.3
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 11:40:27 +0400

 On Tuesday 24 May 2005 19:30, Joseph Scott wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR ports/81405; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >
 > From: Joseph Scott <joseph at randomnetworks.com>
 > To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem at FreeBSD.org>
 > Cc: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
 > Subject: Re: ports/81405: [update] sysutils/adtool to 1.3
 > Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 08:23:05 -0700
 >
 >  On May 24, 2005, at 7:58 AM, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
 >  > Dear maintainer!
 >  >
 >  > Take the PR into account please!
 >
 >  It would be helpful if you simply CC'd me on the original PR, that
 >  way I'd know it was there.
 Sorry Joseph, it was my fault, what i not Cc to you.
 >
 >  I don't approve of this patch.  The white space changes are
 >  completely unnecessary, I'm not sure that changing HAS_CONFIGURE to
 >  GNU_CONFIGURE is correct, and you also removed the prefix setting for
 >  the build (does this tie into GNU_CONFIGURE?).
 >
 >  I appreciate your effort here and would approve the update if the
 >  white space changes weren't included and you explained why you want
 >  to make the other changes (assuming they turn out to be correct)
 >  outside of simply updating the port.
 >
 Yes, i try explain HAS_CONFIGURE exist for programs which have configure, but 
 configure here it maked by autotools, so if we look into bsd.port.mk
 GNU_CONFIGURE is set, "CC=${CC} CCFLAGS=${CFLAGS}                           
 PREFIX=${PREFIX} INSTALLPRIVLIB=${PREFIX}/lib
 INSTALLARCHLIB=${PREFIX}/lib"
 
 With GNU_CONFIGURE we respect more flags as you can see, i think it's better.
 Whitespace cleanup it's too much, i agree with you, but with this cleanups 
 port more aesthetic good-looking.
 >
 >  --
 >  Joseph Scott
 >  URL: http://joseph.randomnetworks.com/
 >  Email: joseph at randomnetworks.com
 >
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > freebsd-ports-bugs at freebsd.org mailing list
 > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs
 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 > "freebsd-ports-bugs-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
 



More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list