ports/81440: Major improvements to x11-wm/fvwm2-devel port

Alexey Dokuchaev danfe at FreeBSD.org
Wed May 25 04:40:38 UTC 2005


On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:00:58PM -0400, Parv wrote:
> in message <200505241511.j4OFBuMV073443 at freefall.freebsd.org>,
> wrote Alexey Dokuchaev thusly...
> >
> > Synopsis: Major improvements to x11-wm/fvwm2-devel port
> > 
> > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->cy
> > Responsible-Changed-By: danfe
> > Responsible-Changed-When: Tue May 24 15:11:37 GMT 2005
> > Responsible-Changed-Why: 
> > Over to maintainer.
> > 
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=81440
> 
> General *ARGH! CARP!* for the port being OPTION-ified.

I'm not sure I understand this assessment correctly. :-)

> 
> More importantly, to the PR originator, why "WITHOUT_XINERAMA ... is
> of little use"?  Perhaps not to you, but i do use it.

So, it's like you have dual-head setup, but don't want to use it for
FVWM?  In this case, I can rework my patches.  Cy@, your call?



More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list