ports/83033: [PATCH] Update of the www/nanoblogger port.

[Julien Gabel]

> Synopsis: [PATCH] Update of the www/nanoblogger port.
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: pav
> State-Changed-When: Wed Jul 6 15:58:30 GMT 2005
> State-Changed-Why:
> Your patch does not apply onto the port. Please resend your patch and make
> sure whitespace does not change, especially that tabulators don't get
> changed to spaces.
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->pav
> Responsible-Changed-By: pav
> Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jul 6 15:58:30 GMT 2005
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
> Track
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=83033

Ok.  With a fresh cvsup'ed /usr/ports, i get the following results:

# cd /usr/ports
# patch < /tmp/nanoblogger.patch
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -ruN www/nanoblogger.old/Makefile www/nanoblogger/Makefile
|--- www/nanoblogger.old/Makefile       Mon Dec 27 04:39:14 2004
|+++ www/nanoblogger/Makefile   Tue Jul  5 19:34:04 2005
--------------------------
Patching file www/nanoblogger/Makefile using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 7.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 15.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 27.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -ruN www/nanoblogger.old/distinfo www/nanoblogger/distinfo
|--- www/nanoblogger.old/distinfo       Mon Dec 27 04:39:14 2004
|+++ www/nanoblogger/distinfo   Tue Jul  5 19:45:10 2005
--------------------------
Patching file www/nanoblogger/distinfo using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -ruN www/nanoblogger.old/files/patch-nb www/nanoblogger/files/patch-nb
|--- www/nanoblogger.old/files/patch-nb Fri Nov 12 16:30:57 2004
|+++ www/nanoblogger/files/patch-nb     Tue Jul  5 19:34:04 2005
--------------------------
Patching file www/nanoblogger/files/patch-nb using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -ruN www/nanoblogger.old/pkg-descr www/nanoblogger/pkg-descr
|--- www/nanoblogger.old/pkg-descr      Thu Jul 15 10:20:04 2004
|+++ www/nanoblogger/pkg-descr  Tue Jul  5 19:34:04 2005
--------------------------
Patching file www/nanoblogger/pkg-descr using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 4.
done

It is certainly a problem using copy and paste in send-pr(1).  You can
found the corresponding patch at:
 http://www.thilelli.net/~jgabel/pub/PR/83033/

Here is the MD5 checksum for the patch:
# md5 nanoblogger.patch
MD5 (nanoblogger.patch) = c224ebeb996d5f25092f204aa325b92c

-- 
-jpeg.
"The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected."
Unix Programmer's Manual, 2nd Ed., June 12, 1972