ports/76116: PORT UPDATE: graphics/lcms (with PATCH)
Raphael Langerhorst
raphael-langerhorst at gmx.at
Thu Jan 20 20:40:24 UTC 2005
The following reply was made to PR ports/76116; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Raphael Langerhorst <raphael-langerhorst at gmx.at>
To: Volker Stolz <vs at freebsd.org>
Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi at corbulon.video-collage.com>,
freebsd-gnats-submit at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/76116: PORT UPDATE: graphics/lcms (with PATCH)
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:36:46 +0100
On Thursday 20 January 2005 15:02, Volker Stolz wrote:
> Am 20. Jan 2005 um 14:55 CET schrieb Raphael Langerhorst:
> > (so I didn't use the ports configuration). As far as I can see
> > the man pages got install (again). I hope this info is useful for
> > you. Let me know if you need another tests,
>
> Please try again *with* the port-infrastructure :)
> find /usr/local/man -name "*icc*" shows no relevant match, neither
> do I see any installation in the output.
>
> Volker
Hi,
just took the time to check on this issue. I now patched the
graphics/lcms port with my own patch and installed it (WITHOUT the
additional configure arguments, I took the patch AS IS, this means
that --without-jpeg and --without-tiff were not added to the
configure args).
Even though I used the patch the way it was, I didn't get any man
pages installed either (??) although I have no idea why. But they are
obviously not there. This means that they probably don't need to be
listed.
The question would be of course: if the man pages get installed when
building & installing lcms manually, why are they NOT installed with
the port? Or do they get installed into a different location? I
didn't see them installing in the install output either...
(in principle this shows that the upgrade is ok, the man-page /
no-manpage question probably doesn't have to do with the version
change as such)
--
Raphael Langerhorst, JID: raphael at jabber.pilgerer.de
G System, The Evolving Universe - http://www.g-system.at
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list