ports/66032: [PATCH] bsd.port.mk: clean room installation

[Kris Kennaway]

On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 09:21:43AM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:

> >OpenBSD does this - how does their implementation differ (variable
> >names, method, etc)?
> 
> What do you want to know? OpenBSD calls it `fake' installation, has
> some more knobs to customize the process (like renaming DESTDIR):
> 
>  .if !defined(FAKE_FLAGS)
>  FAKE_FLAGS=${DESTDIRNAME}=${WRKINST}
>  .endif
> 
> IMHO we can add these when need arises. Otherwise it seems FAKE is the
> default in OpenBSD, so a port has to set FAKE=no if it doesn't want to
> do this. Is compatibility with OpenBSD an issue?

Not per se, but I'd like to avoid reinventing the wheel where
practical.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/attachments/20040519/d6089c88/attachment.sig>