ports/52790: New port: shells/bash-completion
Sergey Matveychuk
sem at ciam.ru
Thu Jun 5 23:10:19 UTC 2003
The following reply was made to PR ports/52790; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem at ciam.ru>
To: Kirk Strauser <kirk at strauser.com>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit at FreeBSD.org, ports at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/52790: New port: shells/bash-completion
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 03:08:45 +0400
Kirk Strauser wrote:
> Thanks for fixing that. It worked correctly on my system before using the
> "shar" command to create the archive, but I don't know enough about that
> command to get it to do the right thing.
I think the pacth was good and may be shar archive too. But something
has changed tabs with white spaces. May be your MUA?
> Should it be dependent on bash2? While I agree that it's mostly useless
> without bash2, isn't there a possibility that it could be regarded as
> documentation, or used with a Linux bash from one of the linux_base
> installations?
Yes, there is a possibility. But I don't think a man will use bash
without putting path to it into $PATH.
If so port will satisfied. But if the port will not found bash in $PATH
it'll install shell/bash2. I think it's reasonable.
---
Sem.
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list