ports/52877: Non-Maintainer-Update: mail/postfix add support VDA softquotas patch

[Xavier Beaudouin]

Le mercredi, 9 jul 2003, à 19:48 Europe/Paris, Sergey A. Osokin a écrit 
:

> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 06:44:23PM +0200, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
>>
>> Le mercredi, 9 jul 2003, ? 18:38 Europe/Paris, Sergey A. Osokin a 
>> ?crit
>> :
>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 12:33:18PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "XB" == Xavier Beaudouin <kiwi at oav.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>> XB> Here is the patch for 2.0.13, notice that it is also available 
>>>> at
>>>> XB> http://www.oav.net/vda/postfix.patch as well
>>>>
>>>> Looks ok to me, except I disagree with the bump of PORTREVISION.  It
>>>> is not necessary since no existing installations are affected.
>>>
>>> Hmm, I think Xavier Beaudouin add new functionality to this port,
>>> and the right way is bump PORTREVISION, isn't it?
>>
>> Bumping PORTREVISION may not be necessary... Since I added new
>> functionnality I was thinking it is a good idea. But this part for me
>> is not really important for me...
>
> OK. Another problem is place for patch postfix-2.0.13.v2.patch.gz and
> I think it must be at ports/distfiles/postfix, right?
> If answer is yes, I have a following:
> $ make
> ===>  Extracting for postfix-2.0.13,1
>>> Checksum OK for postfix/postfix-2.0.13.tar.gz.
>>> Checksum OK for postfix/postfix-2.0.13.v2.patch.gz.
> ===>  Patching for postfix-2.0.13,1
> ===>  Applying distribution patches for postfix-2.0.13,1
> File to patch:
>
> Any idea?

Really strange, because on my test machine it is in distsfiles/postfix 
and it is compiling....

Ok I see I forgot a :
echo "PATCH_STRIP=	-p1" in the configure.postfix file.

It was working because I used IPv6TLS patch as well...

/Xavier