[Bug 247456] ports-mgmt/pkg use of .note.tag to determine osname
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Sun Jun 21 08:24:55 UTC 2020
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247456
Bug ID: 247456
Summary: ports-mgmt/pkg use of .note.tag to determine osname
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Some People
Priority: ---
Component: Individual Port(s)
Assignee: pkg at FreeBSD.org
Reporter: dewayne at heuristicsystems.com.au
Assignee: pkg at FreeBSD.org
Flags: maintainer-feedback?(pkg at FreeBSD.org)
When the innocuous define of NOTE_FREEBSD_VENDOR is changed from
#define NOTE_FREEBSD_VENDOR "FreeBSD" in
/usr/src/lib/csu/common/notes.h
to contain something other than FreeBSD (I'm storing build/date details)
AND
there is no ABI statement explicit in
/usr/local/etc/pkg.conf
these messages are emitted from a 'pkg info -oa'
pkg: failed to get the note section
pkg: failed to get the note section
pkg: Unable to determine ABI
pkg: Cannot parse configuration file!
This was a major surprise when I upgraded the OS. What broke the pkg system as
a result of upgrading stable 12.1 to a later revision??
Explicitly stating the ABI in /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf as
ABI = "freebsd:12:x86:64";
enabled pkg to function. However every invocation of pkg now results in
pkg: failed to get the note section
pkg: failed to get the note section
Suggestions
1) that a dependency notice appear in /usr/src/lib/csu/common/notes.h to advise
that changing NOTE_FREEBSD_VENDOR will impact the pkg's OS detection mechanism
which will require maintenance of the ABI in /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf.
2) pkg suppresses the failure notice as the explicit use of the ABI is
sufficient.
3) I would think that a variable named NOTE_FREEBSD_VENDOR could be used by
vendors in a manner of their choosing. Though perhaps a better approach would
be to add an ELF section explicit for pkg to utilize (something like)
#define PKG_OS FreeBSD
in /usr/src/lib/csu/common/notes.h
if elf section checking is the best route (?)
(And yes, I know that the latter (3) is no small task) :-(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-pkg
mailing list