svn commit: r345760 - in head: contrib/pf sys/netpfil/pf sbin/pfctl

Ermal Luçi eri at freebsd.org
Mon Apr 1 19:53:42 UTC 2019


On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 9:47 AM Rodney W. Grimes <
freebsd-rwg at gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> wrote:

> > On 1 Apr 2019, at 15:48, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> > >> On 01.04.2019 16:30, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > >> It seems it is too late:
> > >>    https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=155409489427092&w=2
> > >
> > > I am wondering on the above as it has a date of:
> > > Date:       2019-04-01 5:01:03
> > >
> > > which would be in line with Kristof's joke.
> > >
> > Yes, OpenBSD are clearly joking as well.
> :-)
>
>
> > >>    http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2019/03/29/msg024883.html
> > > This is inline with what is being proposed here, NetBSD has
> > > old rotted code that needs updated.
> >
> > [Disclaimer: I do not speak for NetBSD, and based this on my reading of
> > that thread]
> >
> > NetBSD however are serious.
> > Their situation is slightly different, in that their primary reason is
> > that they don?t have a maintainer for their pf version and it?s
> > suffering from significant bitrot.
> >
> > Our situation is somewhat better. Our pf is maintained and does get bug
> > fixes and improvements. Not as many as I?d like, but there?s
> > something.
>
> I know for a fact that there is desire, with financials avaliable,
> to get our code updated.  I do not think there is any specific
> criteria desired, other than moved closer to the OpenBSD version.
>
> > > Rather than do that work
> > > twice, do it 1.5 times (implementing the same technology in
> > > 2 OS's should be less work than doing it twice.)
> > >
> > > I believe there is grant money avaliable from a non Foundation
> > > source that could be used to do this work.
> > >
> > I?m not at all opposed to updating our pf, but there are a few
> > obstacles (technical: performance, syntax and vimage. Practical: this is
> > a lot of work). If people are interested in that discussion I?d
> > propose someone start a new thread on freebsd-pf@, and I?ll expand on
> > what I think the problems are and what needs to be done.
>
> I have forwarded this mail onto that list, including those who did respond:
>         Andrey V. Elsukov <bu7cher at yandex.ru>,
>         Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik at gmail.com>
> to the commit,  with my comments here.
>
> > I?d also be interested in knowing what people are looking for from an
> > updated pf in FreeBSD. What are the improvements in OpenBSD that you?d
> > really like to see in FreeBSD?
>
> I need to bring the person I spoke with at IETF/104 into this
> discussion, they can provide additional details.  Sadly I wrote
> down the wrong email address, but have resources to get the right
> one just going to take me a day.
>
>
If there is interest on updating pf lets talk about it.
Possibly simplify the pain of keeping in-sync in the way.



> > Regards,
> > Kristof
> --
> Rod Grimes
> rgrimes at freebsd.org
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-pf at freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>


-- 
Ermal


More information about the freebsd-pf mailing list