call for testers: altq in current

[Eygene Ryabinkin]

Nate, good day!

Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 12:42:32PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > I see no difference between the -CURRENT from today and from 30th
> > March (I see that your commit was made at 26th of March, but I am
> > not sure that mu current was updated after it for the -CURRENT
> > compiled at 30th of March).
> > 
> > The bad news are that the ALTQ behaves wrong: when the CPU frequency
> > is changed the bandwidth changes too. Either I am doing something
> > wrong, or your commit should be polished a bit.
> 
> First, add a printf at line 915 (end of function tsc_freq_changed() in
> sys/contrib/altq/altq/altq_subr.c):
> 	printf("machclk_freq now %d\n", machclk_freq);
                                 ^^
Should be %lu, I believe?

> Does it trigger when you change the cpu freq?  Is the number printent
> correct (i.e. 400 million for 400 Mhz)?

Yes, the numbers are perfectly correct. I will try to redo the
tests on Monday (when I will be able to use the LAN link) and
will watch for this debug information. Any other recommendations
are, of course, welcome.

> > First two logs, ifstat.bw3Kb.old.wan.log and ifstat.bw3Kb.new.wan.log
> > do show the WAN results. The 100 Kbps corresponds to 400 MHz, 200
> > Kbps -- to 800 MHz, 410 Kbps -- to 1600 MHz and 560 Kbps -- to 2200
> > MHz CPU speed. I thought that I was bounded by the WAN link here.
> 
> What was the CPU speed on bootup?

2200 MHz.
-- 
Eygene