ports/121992: [PATCH] archivers/p5-Compress-LZW: CPAN Macro

Rong-en Fan grafan at gmail.com
Sun Mar 23 11:50:02 UTC 2008


The following reply was made to PR ports/121992; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Rong-en Fan" <grafan at gmail.com>
To: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/121992: [PATCH] archivers/p5-Compress-LZW: CPAN Macro
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:20:18 +0800

 On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Philip M. Gollucci
 <pgollucci at p6m7g8.com> wrote:
 > Rong-en Fan wrote:
 >  > First, when you using CPAN, it has SUBDIR set to the correct
 >  > directory if you use module's name as PORTNAME.
 >  D'oh I didn't see that logic in bsd.*mk
 >
 >  > Second, I'm not sure if this is a good idea to that just switch to the macro
 >  > without any version update.
 >  Since when has a port update to newer FreeBSD ports architecture needed
 >  a version update too?
  
 I think there is a tradition to do so if this is done port by port.
 I believer this kind of change should be done in one big commit
 if this is the way to go.
 
 >  What about port@ ports?
  
 perl@ is not ports at .
  
 >  Also, what about ports that use authors path one ?
 >  archivers/p5-IO-Zlib
 >  -MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR=    ../../authors/id/T/TO/TOMHUGHES
 
 It's not supported by the CPAN module. But it IO/ contains
 IO::Zlib, then remove the authors subdir (IIRC, this is a long
 term goal of perl ports).
 
 >  > If perl@ thinks that we are going to use CPAN macro by default,
 >  > then perhaps change all perl@ maintained ports at once will
 >  > be better.
 >  Even is thats the case, I can still submit one patch for it perl@ agrees.
 
 Yes, but I suggest that you submit one PR for all perl@ ports. :-)
  
 Regards,
 Rong-En Fan


More information about the freebsd-perl mailing list