ports/121992: [PATCH] archivers/p5-Compress-LZW: CPAN Macro
Rong-en Fan
grafan at gmail.com
Sun Mar 23 11:50:02 UTC 2008
The following reply was made to PR ports/121992; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Rong-en Fan" <grafan at gmail.com>
To: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/121992: [PATCH] archivers/p5-Compress-LZW: CPAN Macro
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:20:18 +0800
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Philip M. Gollucci
<pgollucci at p6m7g8.com> wrote:
> Rong-en Fan wrote:
> > First, when you using CPAN, it has SUBDIR set to the correct
> > directory if you use module's name as PORTNAME.
> D'oh I didn't see that logic in bsd.*mk
>
> > Second, I'm not sure if this is a good idea to that just switch to the macro
> > without any version update.
> Since when has a port update to newer FreeBSD ports architecture needed
> a version update too?
I think there is a tradition to do so if this is done port by port.
I believer this kind of change should be done in one big commit
if this is the way to go.
> What about port@ ports?
perl@ is not ports at .
> Also, what about ports that use authors path one ?
> archivers/p5-IO-Zlib
> -MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= ../../authors/id/T/TO/TOMHUGHES
It's not supported by the CPAN module. But it IO/ contains
IO::Zlib, then remove the authors subdir (IIRC, this is a long
term goal of perl ports).
> > If perl@ thinks that we are going to use CPAN macro by default,
> > then perhaps change all perl@ maintained ports at once will
> > be better.
> Even is thats the case, I can still submit one patch for it perl@ agrees.
Yes, but I suggest that you submit one PR for all perl@ ports. :-)
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
More information about the freebsd-perl
mailing list