ffmpeg & ULE

[Eduardo Morras]

At 17:45 18/10/2011, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
>Ð’ Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:30:22 +0100
>Vincent Hoffman <vince at unsane.co.uk> пишет:
>
> > On 18/10/2011 16:24, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > > Ð’ Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:02:47 +0800
> > > Adrian Chadd <adrian at freebsd.org> пишет:
> > >
> > >> What is FBFS?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Adrian
> > > :)
> > > http://rudot.blog.com/
> > or
> > http://wiki.freebsd.org/RudolfTomori/rudotSoC2011
> >
> > The blog entry was interesting in that it gives some context to the 2
> > images you previously posted as does the wiki entry.
> >
> > Vince
>
>they are very different four images - made on different systems
>Forgive me for offtopic :(

I think it's on topic. Andriy Gapon requested any 
facts that demostrates or shows examples when ULE 
scheduler is not so good than others. The images 
shows how the 3 schedulers performs with the same 
workload when number of cores is changed. Perhaps 
it's not a scientific and statistically valid 
but, for me, it shows when is ULE under other schedulers.

Also, some people has asked and pointed about 
using 4BSD and not ULE in 8.x because it works 
better for some type of workload.