UDP performance.
David Gilbert
dgilbert at dclg.ca
Mon Mar 5 18:36:51 UTC 2007
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Anderson <anderson at freebsd.org> writes:
Eric> On 02/28/07 03:06, Peter Losher wrote:
>> Ivan Voras wrote:
>> We recently put a stock Fedora Core 6 and a stock FreeBSD 6.2 on
>> the same HW (HP ProLiant DL320 G5 Dual Core Xeons w/ 16GB RAM) and
>> running BIND 9.4.0 and a well known ccTLD zone that we slammed a
>> query stream to. On a single threaded BIND, there was a 20%
>> advantage to Linux, on a multi threaded build, Linux trounced
>> FreeBSD (39k to 89k queries/sec)
I don't believe this is specifically a FreeBSD UDP performance issue.
Using NSD as the nameserver and fast core-2 duos, FreeBSD was able to
old 140k queries/sec while linux (on the same machine) ran 90k queries
per second. This was using two server threads. I believe the numbers
were 120k and 80k for one server thread.
But: the whole reason I'm testing NSD for a client is because BIND has
huge performance bottlenecks with large zones (bind reportedly takes
20 minutes from when it run to when it's ready to serve the first
query).
Dave.
--
============================================================================
|David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can be |
|Mail: dave at daveg.ca | equal if and only if they |
|http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. |
=========================================================GLO================
More information about the freebsd-performance
mailing list