ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7
Julian Elischer
julian at elischer.org
Sun Dec 2 15:01:40 PST 2007
Josh Carroll wrote:
>> I just ran through some of my benchmarks on a kernel build from
>> sources as of today, and I've noticed an improvement for the ffmpeg
>> workload. Here's a comparison of 4bsd, ule (BETA1) and ule (BETA3).
>> This is vanilla source with no patches applied:
>
> Sorry, the ministat output was mangled. I'll try this again with 80
> columns instead.
>
> Also, please disregard the buildworld comparison, as world has changed
> since the previous 4bsd and ule runs, so obviously that's not a valid
> comparison. Sorry about that.
>
> Here are the ministat outputs for ffmpeg and sysbench, truncated to 80
> columns instead. Hopefully that'll come through properly.
>
is bigger better or worse?
> Josh
>
>
> ffmpeg:
>
> x 4bsd
> + ule
> * uleb3
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> |x xx xx * * * * * + + ++ +|
> | |____A___| |_____AM____| |____MA_____| |
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
> x 5 93.28 94.05 93.74 93.746 0.29686697
> + 5 97.56 98.7 98.03 98.042 0.41924933
> Difference at 95.0% confidence
> 4.296 +/- 0.529778
> 4.5826% +/- 0.565121%
> (Student's t, pooled s = 0.363249)
> * 5 95.58 96.69 96.37 96.278 0.42446437
> Difference at 95.0% confidence
> 2.532 +/- 0.534176
> 2.70092% +/- 0.569812%
> (Student's t, pooled s = 0.366265)
>
> sysbench:
>
> x 4bsd
> + ule
> * uleb3
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> |x x x x + ++ * + * *|
> | |___A_M_| |_____AM|___|A_____||
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
> x 5 2151.75 2172.05 2166.7 2163.14 8.1262968
> + 5 2274.13 2309.66 2298.99 2296.89 13.648515
> Difference at 95.0% confidence
> 133.75 +/- 16.3813
> 6.18314% +/- 0.757294%
> (Student's t, pooled s = 11.2321)
> * 3 2303.61 2327.29 2313.17 2314.69 11.912951
> Difference at 95.0% confidence
> 151.55 +/- 17.0782
> 7.00602% +/- 0.789509%
> (Student's t, pooled s = 9.5567)
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-performance at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-performance
mailing list