Please help me tune FreeBSD for bulk.fefe.de/scalability/
Jeff Roberson
jroberson at chesapeake.net
Fri Oct 24 17:15:54 PDT 2003
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Felix von Leitner wrote:
>
> > Please also tell me if you have suggestions for other benchmarks that
> > say something about the scalability of an operating system, that I could
> > (and should) include in my benchmark suite.
>
> If you have some spare time, I'd really be interested in how the new
> SCHED_ULE scheduler compares against the traditional (default) SCHED_4BSD
> scheduler (although SCHED_ULE has been designed for SMP, some UP results
> are sure nice to have).
ULE has developed some performance problems. I'm not sure where they came
from but I will be working on it in the next few weeks. Until then I
wouldn't recommend any benchmarking with it unless the CPU affinity will
really be a huge win.
>
> Regarding performance tuning: did you already look at accf_http(9) and/or
> accf_data(9)? (Although it would probably need some rewrite of your
> code...)
>
> regards,
> le
>
> --
> Lukas Ertl eMail: l.ertl at univie.ac.at
> UNIX Systemadministrator Tel.: (+43 1) 4277-14073
> Vienna University Computer Center Fax.: (+43 1) 4277-9140
> University of Vienna http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-performance at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
More information about the freebsd-performance
mailing list