Unable to build editors/openoffice.org-2 on 6.1

[NAKATA Maho]

From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy at optushome.com.au>
Subject: Re: Unable to build editors/openoffice.org-2 on 6.1
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:38:36 +1100

> On Mon, 2006-Dec-25 09:35:31 +0900, NAKATA Maho wrote:
> >> ######################################################
> >> Systemcall  (Try 1): epm -f bsd openoffice.org-gnome-integration /home/ports_work/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOE680_m6/instsetoo_native/unxfbsdi.pro/OpenOffice/bsd/listfile/en-US/epm_OpenOffice_gid_Module_Optional_Gnome_unxfbsdi_OOE680__en-US.lst -v  2>&1 |
> >> epm: Unable to execute "pkg_create" program: No such file or directory
> >> ESP Package Manager v3.7.0
> >> Copyright 1999-2003 by Easy Software Products.
> >> Patched for OpenOffice.org
> >
> >This seems to be known issue that epm cannot parse too long pathname (255?)
> >please try /usr/ports instead of /home/ports_work/
> 
> My ports tree is a read-only NFS mount at /usr/ports.  I have WRKDIRPREFIX
> set to /home/ports_work, creating the above path.  I don't believe that my
> problem is the epm pathname limit because:
> 1) The pathnames listed are still well below 255 characters.
> 2) The problem goes away if epm explicitly uses /usr/sbin/pkg_create
>    instead of relying on $PATH (see ports/107126)
> 3) Changing WRKDIRPREFIX to /home/a fails in an identical fashion even
>    though I can build OOo2 with WRKDIRPREFIX=/var/obj on another host
>    with /usr/sbin in $PATH.
okay, now I understand what you say. committed, and raised as an issue
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73157 to upstreamed.
in your case, you don't need to fill out JCA (joint copyright assignment),
as epm is external program.

all the best,
-- NAKATA, Maho (maho at FreeBSD.org)