OO2 and AMD64

[Jung-uk Kim]

On Thursday 11 May 2006 09:44 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Thursday 11 May 2006 08:49 pm, NAKATA Maho wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In Message-ID: <4462D8CF.7040903 at panix.homeunix.org>
> >
> > "Carlos F. A. Paniago" <carlos.paniago at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Maho and People: Does someone knows about OO2.0.2 and AMD64?
> > > All the
> >
> > Recently Jan Holesovsky, Caolan, Pavel did a great work for AMD64
> > see http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~kendy/blog/
> > I think 2.0.3 includes almost all patches needed for GNU/Linux
> > AMD64.
> >
> > Carlos Eduardo donated FBSD amd64 access for me(even though
> > I own two opteron boxes which are used in my research).
> > I'm currently working for that. However, I'm bit busy in these
> > days, please do not expect very soon availability.
> > I don't think ooo-build is good for me. We must take care of
> > the same FBSD patch at different place (both ports and ooo-build)
> > it complicates the porting process, so thats why
> > I'm working at openoffice.org-2.0-devel.
>
> I was secretly working on it for a week now. ;-)  My highly
> experimental patch is here:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/OOo20-m167.diff
>
> It has some rough edges, so you may have to intervene build
> process. I am updating this patch against m168 now.

I just updated the patch:

http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/OOo20-m168.diff

'WITH_GNUGCJ' option on amd64 will require this patch:

http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/gcj41-amd64.diff

However, I haven't tested it at all.  You've been warned!

Jung-uk Kim