I'll mark as BROKEN (openoffice-1.1, openoffice-2.0)

[Kris Kennaway]

On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 06:28:36PM +0900, Nakata Maho wrote:
> Dear all,
> Kris has reported several times that openoffice-1.1 and openoffice-2.0
> are broken.
> Kris reported random break.
> I'm not currenlty interested in 1.0 series.
> 
> please let me know for other situations.
>                  1.1    1.1-devel    2.0-devel 
> -------------------------------------------------
> o 4.10-RELEASE    ??      ??           ??
> o 4-stable        ??      ??           ??
> o 5-current       ??      ??           ??
> o 5.2.1-RELEASE   ok      ok           ok
> -------------------------------------------------
> ok means builds successfully
> 
> please fill `??' or fix is extremely appreciated.

Currently all of the '??' are 'no'.  The only openoffices that build
for me are OO-1.0 on FreeBSD 4.x.  OO-1.1 in a 4.x chroot (which is
how the packages are built) seems to think it's building on 5.x,
e.g. it's obtaining the version information by querying the kernel
instead of using uname or passing in OSVERSION.

The 5-current builds used to be non-deterministic (they'd usually
fail, but if rerun enough times from scratch they'd eventually
succeed).  I haven't checked the latest logs to verify they're still
failing in random places.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-openoffice/attachments/20040618/24ec9351/attachment.bin