patch-config_office

[Norikatsu Shigemura]

On 14 Feb 2004 10:23:12 -0500
Adam Weinberger <adamw at magnesium.net> wrote:
> statements that the part of patch-config_office that explicitly says
> "use -lc_r on 5.X" is magically transformed to "use -lpthread on 5.X"
> but only on one particular openoffice developer's machine.

	I don't know a statement for that patch.  I think this is right.
	But,

> I am frustrated because I haven't heard "you're wrong" or "you're right
> but shut up for a while cuz we're busy;" I've only heard "I have no idea
> what you're talking about."

	I know to stay unchanged.  There is a problem in kernel scheduler
	which was reported by Taku YAMAMOTO <taku at cent.saitama-u.ac.jp> at
	current at FreeBSD.org.  I confirmed this behavior and improvement by
	Taku's patch.  So I made and have japanese/openoffice-1.1:-).

> Please give me a head's up so I can stop wondering why I haven't heard
> any response on a trivial and seemingly obvious fix. I'm not asking for
> anything more than acknowledgement that I have not forgotten how to read
> shell scripts. You're welcome to tell me to shit up and stop being a
> PITA, but please give me something more than "patch-config_office
> doesn't include -lc_r; that's just a weather balloon."

	I am not speaking as OOo maintainer, but I think this is "Not
	Objected by" case.  From maho@ and daichi@ (and mbr@ indirectly),
	I heard that I(we?) give up why cannot compile, and have no idea.