[avg@FreeBSD.org: Re: ports/156253: [exp-run] [patch] Update
devel/boost-* from 1.45 to 1.46.1]
Doug Barton
dougb at FreeBSD.org
Sun Mar 4 18:26:14 UTC 2012
My port is already up to date.
Where can we get a copy of the latest version of an updated boost port?
To what extent are these problems being caused by local modifications to
boost?
Doug
On 03/03/2012 23:39, Mark Linimon wrote:
> At some point FreeBSD needs to update to the latest version of boost
> One or more of your ports was shown to break during our last -exp run:
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.8-exp.20120127093941/
>
> Can each of you take a look to see if the latst version of the port from
> upstream fixes known problems with boost?
>
> Thanks.
>
> mcl
>
> for reference:
>
> aqsis- gahr at FreeBSD.org
> cgal- wenheping at gmail.com
> eiskaltdcpp-lib- gelraen.ua at gmail.com
> galaxyhack- ports at FreeBSD.org
> gigi- oliver at FreeBSD.org
> gstreamer-qt4- fluffy at FreeBSD.org
> lander- amdmi3 at FreeBSD.org
> libYGP- ports at FreeBSD.org
> libreoffice- office at FreeBSD.org
> libtorrent-rasterbar- dougb at FreeBSD.org
> luxrender- danfe at FreeBSD.org
> merkaartor- dev2 at heesakkers.info
> mkvtoolnix- multimedia at FreeBSD.org
> openlierox- amdmi3 at FreeBSD.org
> openvrml- ports at FreeBSD.org
> plee-the-bear- amdmi3 at FreeBSD.org
> ros-common- rene at FreeBSD.org
> scribe- jnlin at csie.nctu.edu.tw
> simgear- martymac at FreeBSD.org
> springlobby- amdmi3 at FreeBSD.org
> wesnoth- philip at FreeBSD.org
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Andriy Gapon <avg at FreeBSD.org> -----
>
> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 16:35:52 +0200
> From: Andriy Gapon <avg at FreeBSD.org>
> To: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org, churanov.port.maintainer at gmail.com
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: ports/156253: [exp-run] [patch] Update devel/boost-* from 1.45
> to 1.46.1
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
> rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120221 Thunderbird/10.0.2
>
> Just a note that 1.49 has been released.
>
> Regarding the exp-run results and this comment
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/156253#reply7 - I think that the
> number of the failing ports is sufficiently small and the current boost version is
> sufficiently outdated to justify breaking those ports and putting onus on their
> maintainers and upstreams.
>
> I suspect that in some case just updating the ports to the latest upstreams could
> fix the problems.
>
>
> http://pointyhat.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/a.8-exp.20120127093941/libreoffice-3.4.5.log
> This bug report seems to describe the same issue and has fixes:
> https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=64945
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43139
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/a.8-exp.20120127093941/gstreamer-qt4-0.10.1_1.log
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/a.8-exp.20120127093941/wesnoth-1.8.6.log
> Googling for <error: 'boost::BOOST_FOREACH' has not been declared> provides a
> number of recipes for a fix - the problem seems to be universally caused by
> #define foreach BOOST_FOREACH somewhere in (non-boost) source code.
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/a.8-exp.20120127093941/gstreamer-qt4-0.10.1_1.log
> Again google helps (<Parse error at "BOOST_JOIN">):
> https://bugreports.qt-project.org//browse/QTBUG-22829
>
> Every problem seems to have a solution already. We are not the first to use newer
> boost :-)
> But it's unreasonable to expect that a single person should fix all the problems
> in advance. The task should be parallelized among maintainers of the dependent
> ports (and their users with hacking skills).
>
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
More information about the freebsd-office
mailing list