ports/164230: repocopy request: editors/openoffice.org-3-devel to editors/apache-openoffice-3-devel

[Pedro Giffuni]

Hi Maho;

How about 
PKGNAMEPREFIX= apache-
PKGNAMESUFFIX= ${LANG_PKGNAME}${LANG_SUFFIX}

So we get:
apache-openoffice-3-devel-en_US

(We should probably take the 3 out too)

cheers,

Pedro.

--- Mar 17/1/12, Maho NAKATA <maho at FreeBSD.org> ha scritto:

> Hi all,
> 
> Many thanks for discussion.
> 
> It looks all understands adding "apache" makes sense.
> 
> However, PKGNAMEPREFIX is defined as ${LANG_PKGNAME}, and
> PKGNAMESUFFIX is 
> defined as ${LANG_SUFFIX} therefore, English and Japanese
> version 
> should be something like: 
> 
> en-openoffice-3-devel_US
> and
> ja-openoffice-3-devel_JP
> .
> 
> Adding apache looks long.
> en-apache-openoffice-3-devel_US
> ja-apache-openoffice-3-devel_JP
> 
> In my opinion, choosing politically correct one is good.
> 
> so let's have a ballot;
> 1. en-openoffice-3-devel_US
> 2. en-apache-openoffice-3-devel_US
> 
> for me,
> 2. en-apache-openoffice-3-devel_US
> 
> thanks
> 
> 
> From: Eitan Adler <lists at eitanadler.com>
> Subject: Re: Fw: ports/164230: repocopy request:
> editors/openoffice.org-3-devel to
> editors/apache-openoffice-3-devel
> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:48:55 -0500
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Pedro Giffuni <pfg at freebsd.org>
> wrote:
> > 
> >> Adding the Apache name to the brand is the
> standard Apache
> >> policy and in the ports tree we already have more
> that
> >> 50 ports for apache projects using the "Apache"
> name.
> > 
> > devel/subversion ?
> > java/axis2 ?
> > 
> > It may make sense to add apache to PKGNAMEPREFIX but
> please don't move the port.
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Eitan Adler
> > 
>