Home Network, step by step?

Tyler Gee geekout at gmail.com
Wed Dec 15 08:24:17 PST 2004


I would also recommend going with pf.  As David said, the
documentation is fantastic, it can do a myriad of things and is (IMO)
quickly going to become the standard.  The pf documentation includes
three common scenarios, one of which is a home network with port
forwarding, so you shouldn't have problems.  Also, check out
bsdforums.org and just do a search and you will find a lot of things.

-wtgee


On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:11:32 +0800 (WST), David Adam
<zanchey at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, R. Scott Kennan wrote:
> 
> > One other thing I don't understand is why I'm being told to install
> > the firewall in this context; are firewalls more than just an
> > intrusion countermeasure? Do they do any 'lifting' on a network beyond
> > blocking unauthorised transfers?
> 
> They do now.
> 
> Partly in response to cleverer security threats, and partly as a
> convergence between routing and firewalling, most modern firewalls - like
> ipf and pf in FreeBSD - are now not so much firewalls, but packet filters.
> They have the ability to inspect and modify any packets going in any
> direction on various interfaces. This makes them an invaluable tool on
> routers in any environment (except, perhaps, Internet core routers, but
> they're another case entirely).
> 
> By the way, someone up the thread a bit recommended you start running
> IPFW (IPFIREWALL). While I'm not currently in a position to give you
> instructions as detailed as James did, I would recommend you start with
> either ipf or pf. IPFW is much older and is somewhat less well maintained,
> the documentation in particular.
> 
> >From the Handbook's IPFW Chapter...
> 
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls-ipfw.html
> 
> "The IPFW stateless rule syntax is empowered with technically
> sophisticated selection capabilities which far surpasses the knowledge
> level of the customary firewall installer. IPFW is targeted at the
> professional user or the advanced technical computer hobbyist who have
> advanced packet selection requirements."
> 
> (Proper use of freebsd-newbies@ approaching!)
> 
> I've had superb results with pf (although for full effect, it will require
> a kernel rebuild). The pf documentation at OpenBSD is very well written
> and easy to follow. Setting up NAT can be a somewhat daunting task
> (personally, I do it at home with Windows' ICS, which is an absolute
> no-brainer) - however, once you get it working it is extremely useful.
> 
> Best of luck! (I really should get back to work - if I can get my system
> at home logged on to the 'net I'll try and run you through the basics of
> setting it up if you still need it.)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> David Adam
> ---
> zanchey at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au
> Medicine: And you thought hacking computers was complex.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-newbies at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>


More information about the freebsd-newbies mailing list