tcp-testsuite into src?

George Neville-Neil gnn at neville-neil.com
Tue Mar 23 11:26:54 UTC 2021



On 22 Mar 2021, at 22:45, Alan Somers wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 7:31 PM Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling at kev009.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was talking with gnn and kevans on IRC about the tcp testsuite
>> (https://github.com/freebsd-net/tcp-testsuite).
>>
>> Currently we maintain this in ports, although the way the port is set
>> up doesn't make a lot of sense because the tests are stack specific
>> and we don't account for different FreeBSD versions let alone vendor
>> trees.  It seems reasonable to me to pull the tests themselves (i.e.
>> https://github.com/freebsd-net/tcp-testsuite) into src where they can
>> follow along with the tree they are running on, and provide vendors a
>> natural point of extension.
>>
>> /usr/tests has some existing examples of relying on out of tree
>> binaries to run so I am not convinced we need to import packetdrill
>> itself but I don't have a strong preference.  tuexen, do you have any
>> preference?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kevin
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>
>
> Yeah, it's not a problem to use binaries from ports in /usr/tests.  As long
> as the tests can compile they can live in the base system.  Is there a
> strong incentive to import them?  Do they need to be adjusted for each
> release?

I found out this morning that moving the tests into base is indeed the plan:

https://wiki.freebsd.org/TransportProtocols/11March2021

I'm happy to see this happen.

The next step will be documentation of how to add new/good tests to the suite.

Best,
George


More information about the freebsd-net mailing list