additional ifreq accessors?
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Tue Apr 7 17:26:52 UTC 2020
--------
In message <20200407172151.GB72584 at spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>, Brooks Davis writes:
>My question for the lists is: should we adopt the
>more-technically-correct accessors in FreeBSD or stick with
>slightly-cheaper and more conventional aliasing approach[0]?
The accessors buys us much more code-isolation, so that would be my vote.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list