RFC: ethctl
Garrett Wollman
wollman at hergotha.csail.mit.edu
Fri Jan 20 18:36:47 UTC 2017
In article <c21ec3d9-a539-6c7d-4bd3-6413e7149b2b at netflix.com> you write:
>Eg, I don't see why we need another tool for some of this missing
>"ethtool" functionality; it seems like most of it would naturally fit
>into ifconfig.
>From the end-user perspective, I agree with Drew. Most of this stuff
should just be part of ifconfig.
>As to other features, like writing firmware images and/or reading
>dumping eeprom -- these were never a natural fit for us.
And I can't say that I've ever wanted to do this. Most of the
machines we buy these days are Dells, and Dell USC takes care of all
the firmware updates. Having a not-really-generic firmware
programming interface that only works for network interfaces seems
like very limited value. I wouldn't object to it, but I doubt I'd
ever use it, and I expect most vendors will want to keep tighter
control over applying firmware updates.
-GAWollman
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list