The fate of ngatm
Slawa Olhovchenkov
slw at zxy.spb.ru
Fri Apr 28 12:13:33 UTC 2017
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 06:00:29PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote:
> As previous threatened, I've removed support for NATM (as well as a
> remarkable number of remnants of the old ATM framework). One piece
> that still remains is the ngatm framework in netgraph. This includes
> the ng_ccatm(4), ng_sscfu(4), ng_sscop(4), and ng_uni(4) nodes.
>
> These don't attach to physical interfaces and didn't depend on the NATM
> interface code so I left them alone in the first cut. My question
> is, are they useful without physical interfaces? If so, keeping them
> doesn't appear to have a high support burden. If not, we should remove
> them.
may be it can be used together w/ USB ADSL modem?
Not sure about suported and existeing modern ADSL USB modem.
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list