long network segment call stack can fail

[Gleb Smirnoff]

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 12:50:52PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
A> hah, that's very pretty. The downside of a completely direct-dispatch
A> network stack. :)

The stack is big, but shouldn't eat 4 pages anyway. Back in the netgraph
hacking times, we used to have stack exhaustion with much longer backtraces.

I expect that somewhere on the list there something huge on stack. 

I assume Dmitry runs with -O0, this is compile that exposes stack
exhaustion first. Did I guess it right, Dmitry?


-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.