[Differential] [Commented On] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections

sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau) phabric-noreply at FreeBSD.org
Mon Apr 18 01:39:14 UTC 2016


sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment.


  In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#127372, @mike-karels.net wrote:
  
  > Setting a retransmission timer on an ACK makes no sense; I don't think tcp_output will send an ACK on a retransmission timeout.
  >
  > Setting timers in the ENOBUFS case is at best a partial fix.  If the ACK is lost locally, we know; if it is lost elsewhere, we don't. We need timers in any case.
  >
  > Setting  a local timer for the ACK case is no better for latency than having the other end run a retransmit timer..
  >
  > If there is a problem with setting the retransmit timer for a FIN, let's fix that.  Otherwise, I stand by my recommendation of deleting the code to set a timer.
  
  
  Yeah, delete the retransmission timeout is fine w/ me.  Do we reach consensus here?

REVISION DETAIL
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, lstewart, adrian, delphij, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren
Cc: mike-karels.net, jtl


More information about the freebsd-net mailing list