pxeboot with newer Intel NICs
Sean Bruno
sbruno at ignoranthack.me
Fri Jun 26 16:04:19 UTC 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 04/15/15 12:42, Jeremiah Lott wrote:
> I am having trouble using pxeboot with new-ish Intel NICs. We have
> been using pxeboot with Intel NICs as part of our infrastructure
> for a while successfully. Recently, I got some new 2x10G (ixgbe)
> cards as well as a motherboard with built-in 4x1G (igb). Neither
> will work with pxeboot. If I install an older 4x1G PCI card in the
> same server, then it will boot with pxeboot just fine.
>
> It fails at the point that it tries to load the kernel over NFS:
>
> PXE version 2.1, real mode entry point @94ee:0106 BIOS
> 619kB/1983288kB available memory
>
> FreeBSD/x86 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1
> (root at releng1.nyi.freebsd.org, Tue Nov 11 20:57:26 UTC 2014)
> pxe_open: server addr: 10.2.16.3 pxe_open: server path:
> /usr/tftpboot/mfg_FXT5000_WIP /
>
> It just sticks there indefinitely. I took a packet capture on the
> dhcp/tftp/nfs server (limited to the ip address I know this client
> is getting). The initial tftp download of the pxeboot program goes
> through. Then I see more dhcp packets (which I assume are from
> pxeboot program). Then it sends a portmapper request to get the
> port for the mount program. The packet capture on the server shows
> a proper response, but I assume the client is not accepting it,
> because it seems to retry the portmapper request repeatedly.
>
> 2 2.018066 10.2.15.238 -> 10.2.16.3 TFTP Read Request, File:
> pxeboot, Transfer type: octet, tsize\000=0\000 66 3 2.025813
> 10.2.16.3 -> 10.2.15.238 TFTP Option Acknowledgement,
> tsize\000=231424\000 57 4 2.025869 10.2.15.238 -> 10.2.16.3
> TFTP Error Code, Code: Not defined, Message: TFTP Aborted 60 5
> 2.026980 10.2.15.238 -> 10.2.16.3 TFTP Read Request, File:
> pxeboot, Transfer type: octet, blksize\000=1456\000 71 6 2.034408
> 10.2.16.3 -> 10.2.15.238 TFTP Option Acknowledgement,
> blksize\000=1456\000 57 7 2.034462 10.2.15.238 -> 10.2.16.3
> TFTP Acknowledgement, Block: 0 60 8 2.034544 10.2.16.3 ->
> 10.2.15.238 TFTP Data Packet, Block: 1 1502 9 2.034675
> 10.2.15.238 -> 10.2.16.3 TFTP Acknowledgement, Block: 1 60 10
> 2.034699 10.2.16.3 -> 10.2.15.238 TFTP Data Packet, Block: 2
> 1502 11 2.034829 10.2.15.238 -> 10.2.16.3 TFTP
> Acknowledgement, Block: 2 60
>
> .. clipped a bunch of uninteresting data packets ..
>
> 324 2.058989 10.2.16.3 -> 10.2.15.238 TFTP Data Packet,
> Block: 159 1422 325 2.059115 10.2.15.238 -> 10.2.16.3 TFTP
> Acknowledgement, Block: 159 60 326 2.124531 10.2.15.238 ->
> 10.2.16.3 DHCP DHCP Discover - Transaction ID 0x2005fe90 590 327
> 2.638748 10.2.15.238 -> 10.2.16.3 DHCP DHCP Request -
> Transaction ID 0x2005fe90 590 328 2.657297 10.2.15.238 ->
> 10.2.16.3 Portmap V2 GETPORT Call MOUNT(100005) V:3 UDP 118 329
> 2.657398 10.2.16.3 -> 10.2.15.238 Portmap V2 GETPORT Reply
> (Call In 328) Port:644 70 330 4.293463 10.2.15.238 -> 10.2.16.3
> Portmap [RPC retransmission of #328]V2 GETPORT Call (Reply In 329)
> MOUNT(100005) V:3 UDP 118 331 4.293536 10.2.16.3 ->
> 10.2.15.238 Portmap [RPC duplicate of #329]V2 GETPORT Reply (Call
> In 328) Port:644 70 332 8.138219 10.2.15.238 -> 10.2.16.3
> Portmap [RPC retransmission of #328]V2 GETPORT Call (Reply In 329)
> MOUNT(100005) V:3 UDP 118 333 8.138301 10.2.16.3 ->
> 10.2.15.238 Portmap [RPC duplicate of #329]V2 GETPORT Reply (Call
> In 328) Port:644 70 334 14.179978 10.2.15.238 -> 10.2.16.3
> Portmap [RPC retransmission of #328]V2 GETPORT Call (Reply In 329)
> MOUNT(100005) V:3 UDP 118 335 14.180084 10.2.16.3 ->
> 10.2.15.238 Portmap [RPC duplicate of #329]V2 GETPORT Reply (Call
> In 328) Port:644 70
>
> I did notice that these new cards have newer versions of the "Intel
> Boot Agent" firmware. Here is a summary of the versions I tried:
>
> Intel Boot Agent XE v2.3.04 (10G) -> FAILED Intel Boot Agent GE
> v1.5.12 (1G) -> FAILED Intel Boot Agent XE v2.1.60 (10G) -> WORKS
> Intel Boot Agent GE v1.3.51 (1g) -> WORKS
>
> Also, the 1G that works is an 82580, while the one that fails is an
> i350. The working and failed 10G NICs are both 82599EB.
>
> My assumption is that there is some incompatibility between the
> PXE firmware on the newer cards and the pxeboot program. However,
> these are very widely used NICs and if this is really the problem
> it's a little hard to believe other people haven't hit this. Are
> other people using newer Intel 10G (ixgbe) or 1G (igb) NICs with
> pxeboot successfully?
>
> Jeremiah Lott Avere Systems
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To
> unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
>
Hrm ... I think this is going to require a bugzilla report and some
more testing. Can you grab what you have into a bugzilla report?
sean
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=
=7chm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list