netmap-ipfw: kipfw two instances sharing same port

[Eduardo Meyer]

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello!
>
> You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance of
> kipfw on each pair:
> kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0
> kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix1-1
>
> And so on ;) i have about 12 mpps with this configuration (on Linux
> netmap).
>

Wow cool hint and cool numbers.

I will get everything properly bridged on both kipfw instances, right?

I need to simulate like a 3-port bridge... this would me more like

kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0
kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix2-0

But I need the same traffic coming on the wire on ix0 to be available on
both ix1 and ix2.

Will that work like that? I only tried using the default q.








>
>
> On Friday, July 10, 2015, Eduardo Meyer <dudu.meyer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> should ./kipfw <port0> <port1> and another ./kipfw <port0> <port2> work?
>>
>> I want to have two filtered kipfw instances sharing the same WAN port.
>>
>> So far I did a quick test lab and it worked, but since it's a lab
>> environment I don't know if I should expect other problems when I add it
>> to
>> run in a real scenario.
>>
>> What problems should I expect? Can they be minimized?
>>
>> Basic stateless filtering only.
>>
>> --
>> ===========
>> Eduardo Meyer
>> pessoal: dudu.meyer at gmail.com
>> profissional: ddm.farmaciap at saude.gov.br
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
>



-- 
===========
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: dudu.meyer at gmail.com
profissional: ddm.farmaciap at saude.gov.br