IPFW blocked my IPv6 NTP traffic

[Matthew Seaman]

On 2015/12/01 15:05, Mark Felder wrote:
> Notice how almost all of them are port 123 on both sides, but a few of
> them are not. Why? The RFC says that NTP is supposed to be using port
> 123 as both the source and destination port, but I clearly have
> something happening on port 16205. Is something screwy with ntpd in
> CURRENT?

NTP not using port 123 as the source port usually indicates that it is
behind a NAT gateway at the other end.  It's harmless and fairly common.

	Cheers,

	Matthew

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 972 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/attachments/20151201/f167227d/attachment.bin>