ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance
Slawa Olhovchenkov
slw at zxy.spb.ru
Mon Aug 17 12:28:38 UTC 2015
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:27:41AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> hi,
> I have a host (Dell R730) with both cards, connected to an HP8200 switch at 10Gb.
> when writing to the same storage (netapp) this is what I get:
> ix0: ~130MGB/s
> mlxen0 ~330MGB/s
> this is via nfs/tcpv3
>
> I can get similar (bad) performance with the mellanox if I increase the file size
> to 512MGB.
> so at face value, it seems the mlxen does a better use of resources than the intel.
> Any ideas how to improve ix/intel's performance?
Any way, please show
OS version
/var/run/dmesg.boot
What's tuning perfomed (loader.conf, sysctl.conf)?
top -PHS in both cases
ifconfig -a in both cases
netstat -rn in both cases
I am don't know netapp -- what is hardware configuration (disks and
etc) and software tuning (MTU?).
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list