Jails on fib problem

[Beeblebrox]

> what's a fib device? Do you mean each jail has a different default fib?
> you are not using vimage jails?

Hi Julian.
* No vimage
* All jails use the same fib. /etc/rc.conf:
cloned_interfaces="lo2"
ifconfig_lo2="inet 127.0.1.1/28"
static_routes="jail default"
route_jail="default 127.0.1.1 -fib 1"
route_default="default 192.168.1.1"

> so they all have the same address?? can you even do that? or you mean that
> they all have the same default route?
I mean same default route, jail IP's start from 127.0.1.2/32 and go to
127.0.1.6/32
jail.conf assigns fib with "exec.fib = 1;"
jails on the 127.0.1.1/28 subnet range should be able to route traffic
through the 127.0.0.1 gateway regardless of the fact that the jails
themselves reside on a /32 subnet. However, it's not working smoothly

> fibs don't have devices.
Yes, I know  - a misnomer.

setfib 1 netstat -rn
Destination        Gateway            Flags    Netif Expire
default            127.0.1.1          UGS       lo2
127.0.0.1          link#3             UH        lo0
127.0.1.1          link#4             UH        lo2
127.0.1.2          link#4             UH        lo2
127.0.1.3          link#4             UH        lo2
127.0.1.4          link#4             UH        lo2
192.168.1.0/24     link#1             U         re0  (Ext_If)
192.168.2.0/26     link#2             U         re1  (Lan_If)

To complicate things further, I also have a vboxnet0 for VBox guests.
127.0.1.2 is a dns jail for example. The Internal LAN clients,
vboxnet0 guests and lo0 need to resolve names from that jail.