TCP question: Is this simultaneous close handling broken?

[Mike Tancsa]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 1/7/2014 5:40 PM, Peter Wemm wrote:

> The packet may be dropped without processing the FIN flag.

> MFC after:	never

Hi,
	Are there any potential side effects to this fix ? The original
author said they were not going to MFC due to possible regressions. I
know you probably see more FreeBSD traffic then most at Y!, and so are
very sensitive to this, but thought I would ask for clarification.

	---Mike



- -- 
- -------------------
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications, mike at sentex.net
Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada   http://www.tancsa.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSzJA8AAoJEJXHwM2kc8rXYJUH/3Hb7Yh7Lv/sAEjRjN5gN9id
C9B6OlBY3NWfSVYTFngBzqcePuxsGXD4gELA1QQuGa4B2/dYgu62u0+zDdfCyVGx
7WVQlsrg2To9y8Z4SCZ3vCHJ20GxTNtCJEcySldcvCl8Z2Xn2cIk0BQmi5n7icVx
z0ZIcWBTCNskfcLI6jHNFZ6dslRQy3xyleOpp1heQUyaVpfMRNZvOfoL1hnEnS9H
FpnhIdFSKJ48b9Vw4Xql62A+LfCUHHa/Ey8rjEp5K90FTByPcNaDiVddNHZmBVAO
lTmOobA2zsFzSh3fgnXikjCS4MA+3rTKHscduihk4vf6AIKLWx00h4Bp0n7AGoY=
=+cGv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----