A problem on TCP in High RTT Environment.
Michael Tuexen
Michael.Tuexen at lurchi.franken.de
Sat Aug 9 20:57:33 UTC 2014
On 09 Aug 2014, at 22:22, hiren panchasara <hiren.panchasara at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Michael Tuexen
> <Michael.Tuexen at lurchi.franken.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 09 Aug 2014, at 20:42, John-Mark Gurney <jmg at funkthat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Niu Zhixiong wrote this message on Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 20:34 +0800:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> Last month, I send problems related to FTP/TCP in a high RTT environment.
>>>> After that, I setup a simulation environment(Dummynet) to test TCP and SCTP
>>>> in high delay environment. After finishing the test, I can see TCP is
>>>> always slower than SCTP. But, I think it is not possible. (Plz see the
>>>> figure in the attachment). When the delay is 200ms(means RTT=400ms).
>>>> Besides, the TCP is extremely slow.
>>>>
>>>> ALL BW=20Mbps, DELAY= 0 ~ 200MS, Packet LOSS = 0 (by dummynet)
>>>>
>>>> This is my parameters:
>>>> FreeBSD vfreetest0 10.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Aug 7
>>>> 11:04:15 HKT 2014
>>>>
>>>> sysctl net.inet.tcp
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_auto: 0
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_auto: 0
>>>
>>> Try enabling this... This should allow the buffer to grow large enough
>>> to deal w/ the higher latency...
>>>
>>> Also, make sure your program isn't setting the recv buffer size as that
>>> will disable the auto growing...
>> I think the program sets the buffer to 2MB, which it also does for SCTP.
>> So having both statically at the same size makes sense for the comparison.
>> I remember that there was a bug in the combination of LRO and delayed ACK,
>> which was fixed, but I don't remember it was fixed before 10.0...
>
> If you are thinking of r256920, I believe it did make it into 10.0R.
Yepp, that is what I was thinking of...
Best regards
Michael
>
> cheers,
> Hiren
>
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list