dummynet/ipfw high load?
Raimundo Santos
raitech at gmail.com
Sat Apr 12 23:39:12 UTC 2014
On 11 April 2014 05:58, Dennis Yusupoff <dyr at smartspb.net> wrote:
> NAT realized with pf nat, shaping with ipfw dummynet and traffic
> accounting with ng_netflow via ipfw ng_tee.
>
Good time, Dennis.
May I ask how much clients do you nat, shape and account?
Why you do that with both engines (pf + ipfw)? Why not ipfw only with
in-kernel NAT?
Best regards,
Raimundo
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list