[PATCH] Add a new TCP_IGNOREIDLE socket option
Adrian Chadd
adrian at freebsd.org
Wed Feb 13 18:37:54 UTC 2013
On 13 February 2013 02:27, Andre Oppermann <andre at freebsd.org> wrote:
> Again I'd like to point out that this sort of modification should
> be implemented as a congestion control module. All the hook points
> are already there and can readily be used instead of adding more special
> cases to the generic part of TCP. The CC algorithm can be selected per
> socket. For such a special CC module it'd get a nice fat warning that
> it is not suitable for Internet use.
>
> Additionally I speculate that for the use-case of John he may also be
> willing to forgo congestion avoidance and always operate in (ill-named)
> "slow start" mode. With a special CC module this can easily be tweaked.
There are some cute things that could be done here - eg, having an L3
route table entry map to a congestion control (like having an MSS in
the L3 entry too.)
But I'd love to see some modelling / data showing competing congestion
control algorithms on the same set of congested pipes. Doubly so on
multiple congested pipes (ie, modelling a handful of parallel
user<->last-mile<->IX<->various transit feeds with different levels of
congestion/RTT<->IX<->last mile<->user connections.) You all know much
more about this than I do. :-)
Thanks,
Adrian
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list