Use of spinlocks for TCP callouts

John Baldwin jhb at freebsd.org
Tue Jan 3 16:23:50 UTC 2012


On Monday, January 02, 2012 11:35:31 pm Vijay Singh wrote:
> I have see the following call sequence in profiles:
> 
> 
>                                   called/total       parents
> index  %time    self descendents  called+self    name    	index
>                                   called/total       children
> 
>                      0.02        1.14 3822699/7559737     tcp_do_segment
> [154]    0.5    0.03        2.26 7559737                    callout_reset_on
>                      2.19        0.02 7573352/94883048   spinlock_exit
>                      0.01        0.04 7573352/11975031   callout_lock
> 
> It is my perception that spinlocks are expensive. Since general TCP
> locks are sleep mutexes, would there be any merit in building a TCP
> callout facility using sleep mutexes? I can hack something up and
> share here but wanted to check if people know of an existing facility
> that might be used here?

The spinlock in question is probably the callout_mtx itself.  The problem
is that you have to be able to acquire some sort of lock in the timer
interrupt to check the timer state to see if a timer thread should be
scheduled.  That has to be a spin lock.

-- 
John Baldwin


More information about the freebsd-net mailing list