nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) 8129 testers wanted [Re: Question about GPIO bitbang MII]

[Marius Strobl]

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:57:01PM +0300, andrew bliznak wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 03:08 +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 02:46:23AM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 15 Oct 2011, at 22:56, Marius Strobl <marius at alchemy.franken.de> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for
> > > > rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the following
> > > > patch a try in order to ensure it doesn't break anything?
> > > > for 9/head:
> > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/mii_bitbang.diff
> > > > for 8:
> > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/mii_bitbang.diff8
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Marius
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > While I don't have any box with this hardware, I'm thinking you might want to get a bit more specific about what you want tested...
> > > 
> > > What do you think the patch might break ?
> > > 
> > 
> > Basically, if there's something wrong with the patch the driver should
> > fail to attach, if it still does and gets a link all should be fine.
> > 
> > Marius
> > 
> 
> run OK on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #22 r226300M
> 
> 
> nge0: <National Semiconductor Gigabit Ethernet> port 0xd800-0xd8ff mem
> 0xdffff000-0xdfffffff irq 22 at device 2.0 on pci1
> miibus0: <MII bus> on nge0
> nsgphy0: <DP83861 1000BASE-T media interface> PHY 1 on miibus0
> none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT,
> 1000baseT-master, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, auto
> nge0: Ethernet address: 00:30:4f:1e:e4:49
> 

Thanks!

Marius