bce packet loss
Charles Sprickman
spork at bway.net
Tue Jul 12 05:47:58 UTC 2011
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/11/2011 21:09, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>> I've had it hammered into my brain over the years that for servers it's
>> always best to set link speed and duplex manually at both ends to remove
>> any possible issues with link negotiation.
>
> That hasn't been the right thing to do for at least 8 years or so,
> probably 10 or more.
>
> Yes, back in the 90's when all of this stuff was still new it was not
> uncommon to have autonegotiation issues, but any even sort of modern
> hardware (on either side of the link) will do better with auto than not.
Some of us still work at places where the hardware is 10 years old, you
know. :)
I do still see fixed setups in service provider handoffs - for example
this colo, Level3 and Hurricane. Also all our metro ethernet stuff
specifies a fixed configuration.
>From what I can gather, this seems to be the standard practice in that
space, but then again you're supposed to be plugging into equipment that
wouldn't have the buffer issues that a $450 Dell switch would have.
The rule I recall is never do autoneg on one side and fixed on the other,
that more often than not will end up in a duplex mismatch.
Charles
>
> hth,
>
> Doug
>
> --
>
> Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
> -- OK Go
>
> Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
> Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
>
>
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list