Proposed patch for Port Randomization modifications according to RFC6056

[Bjoern A. Zeeb]

On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, Fernando Gont wrote:

Hi,

> On 27/02/2011 05:38 p.m., Doug Barton wrote:
>
>>> Has this been commited to the tree, already? -- If so, what's the
>>> default algorithm?
>>
>> Bjoern was planning to do it, I'm going to do it if he doesn't get
>> around to it.
>>
>> As for default algorithm, is there any reason not to make it 4?
>
> Not at all. Algorithm 4 (double-hash) is the best option, IMO.

I am still planning to do it soon but there is another thing in the
queue touching the pcb code, which are way harder to merge on
conflicts than this, so I am waiting for that to happen first.

/bz

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb                                 You have to have visions!
          Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.