Proposed patch for Port Randomization modifications according to RFC6056

[Doug Barton]

On 02/27/2011 12:23, Fernando Gont wrote:
> On 08/02/2011 03:47 p.m., Doug Barton wrote:
>
> [catching up with e-mail]
>
>> I've been up and running on this patch vs. r218391 for over 24 hours
>> now, using algorithm 4 (as someone said is now the default in Linux)
>> without any problems.
>>
>> I think Bjoern is better qualified than I to comment on the style of the
>> patch, but it applies cleanly, and seems to run fine on both v4 and v6.
>
> Has this been commited to the tree, already? -- If so, what's the
> default algorithm?

Bjoern was planning to do it, I'm going to do it if he doesn't get 
around to it.

As for default algorithm, is there any reason not to make it 4?


Doug

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/