net80211 ratectl proof of concept

[Rui Paulo]

On 31 Mar 2010, at 18:06, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 03:05:27PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
>> On 31 Mar 2010, at 15:04, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:31:30PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
>>>> On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:24, Antoine Brodin wrote:
>>>>> This looks great!
>>>>> Is there specific reasons to use pointers and not ints for some
>>>>> arguments of foo_tx_complete() and foo_tx_update()?
>>>> 
>>>> Not really. I'll probably switch them to ints at some point.
>>> 
>>> Hmm, I somehow like the idea of not passing integers here. Looking at
>>> ath_rate/sample it passes a struct. I don't know whether this can be
>>> rewritten though.
>> 
>> It can be rewritten to pass ints, from what I understand.
> 
> Ok great, looks fine to me.
> 
> Do you intend to commit this in one huge chunk (quite a few drivers
> affected) or create a branch for that?

I wanted people to comment on the general framework.

I wasn't planning on creating a branch, because I didn't feel it was necessary. Porting AMRR code to this framework isn't hard and I can deal with any fallout.

--
Rui Paulo