net80211 ratectl proof of concept

[Rui Paulo]

On 31 Mar 2010, at 15:04, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:31:30PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
>> On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:24, Antoine Brodin wrote:
>>> This looks great!
>>> Is there specific reasons to use pointers and not ints for some
>>> arguments of foo_tx_complete() and foo_tx_update()?
>> 
>> Not really. I'll probably switch them to ints at some point.
> 
> Hmm, I somehow like the idea of not passing integers here. Looking at
> ath_rate/sample it passes a struct. I don't know whether this can be
> rewritten though.

It can be rewritten to pass ints, from what I understand.

--
Rui Paulo