Why lagg(4) wants ~IFF_DRV_OACTIVE?

[Andrew Thompson]

On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:12:25AM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Maybe this is a stupid question but I really don't understand why a
> interface with IFF_DRV_OACTIVE can't be added to a lagg(4) interface.
> Looking at OpenBSD code, they do this since the day 0.
> 
> Could anyone shed some light, why we need to enforce this check? :)

I think it was just carried over, I dont see any reason to keep it.


Andrew