[POLLING] strange interrupt/system load
Barney Cordoba
barney_cordoba at yahoo.com
Mon Sep 14 15:10:33 UTC 2009
--- On Mon, 9/14/09, rihad <rihad at mail.ru> wrote:
> From: rihad <rihad at mail.ru>
> Subject: Re: [POLLING] strange interrupt/system load
> To: "Barney Cordoba" <barney_cordoba at yahoo.com>
> Cc: freebsd-net at FreeBSD.org
> Date: Monday, September 14, 2009, 7:23 AM
> Barney Cordoba wrote:
> >
> >> Without polling (current load around 190-200
> mbit/s, around
> >> 24-26 kpps):
> >>
> >> top:
> >> CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 8.4%
> >> system, 0.0% interrupt, 91.6% idle
> >>
> >> Interrupts/s: 18322 total
> >> 28 mpt0 irq16
> >> 1999 cpu0: time
> >> 6906 em0 irq256
> >> 3392 em1 irq257
> >> 1999 cpu1: time
> >> 1999 cpu2: time
> >> 1999 cpu3: time
> >
> > You really need to look at the taskq usage as
> averaging on a 4 core
> CPU: 0.0% user, 0..0% nice, 10.0% system,
> 0.0% interrupt, 90.0% idle
> 27 root 1
> -68 - 0K
> 16K - 1 137:47 40.28% em0 taskq
> 28 root 1
> -68 - 0K
> 16K - 2 5:05
> 0.88% em1 taskq
>
> > You'll do a lot better setting your ITR to 2000 or so.
> You really don't
> > need an interrupt every 4 packets at those traffic
> levels.
>
> Sorry, how would I do that? And how do I find the current
> ITR value?
>
I made mine a sysctl long ago, so I'm not sure what the current state
of em is. It used to be a macro MAX_INTS_PER_SEC
Barney
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list